Skip to main content

On the Didachi

The Jews are not referenced in the Didache as interpreted in “A Cloud of Witnesses,” at least not specifically. The word “hypocrites” is treated as a vague allusion in a footnote: “Presumably a reference to Pharisees or perhaps to unconverted Jews.” However, the only other reference to outsiders regards the Eucharist: “Do not give what is sacred to the dogs.” This admonition reflects the early exclusive nature of the Jesus movement.

To whomever the author is referring with the word “Hypocrites” (as translated in the text), they are clearly not welcome. A possible clue as to why lies in the treatment of the Lord's Day assembly: “...No one quarreling with his brother may join your meeting until they are reconciled.” This statement, taken with another, more broad observation concerning the end-times mythology found later on the reading: “when lawlessness is on the rise, men will hate and persecute and betray one another,” may indicate one of the core thought processes of these early followers.

It is reasonable to assume that “lawlessness,” was an ancient concept, even in the time of Tiberius. All religions and theologies are essentially systems of order and control if they involve themselves in morality and organization. One of the many challenges early people faced was the threat to themselves by those other humans they encountered. Such concerns are evident in early Christian tradition. Like Temple, Church is intended as a public place, and Christianity as a public organization that isn't easy to get into and doesn't look fondly on outsiders who might disrupt progress and disturb peace. The specific nature of the instructions given in the Didache imply the function of ritual in maintaining this integrity. Each prayer would take even modern students some time to learn, and this would require practice. This practice would require commitment, which could be demonstrated in other ways when found.

Through these instructions, a framework was put in place that might naturally produce leadership, visible in deed and adherence, to the groups that were commanded to “elect render the sacred services.” Perhaps the early Christians had an antagonistic relationship with the Jews, though “A Cloud of Witnesses” relates that the two groups might have otherwise been indistinguishable,” but as translated, the Didache seems unconcerned with this relationship. Certainly the Pharisees and Sadducees would not have looked favorably on the new movement who insisted on prayer to a man who lived and died. But though the Didache doesn't reflect much more than disdain for the unconverted in general, the tone and message of these instructions does seem to regard conflict and quarreling as unproductive and undesirable.

Popular posts from this blog

Review: The Black Side of Shreveport, by Willie Burton

Burton, Willie. The Black Side of Shreveport. Shreveport : Southern University of Louisiana, 1983, 159. Reviewed by Steven Harkness. With the Emancipation Proclamation, Abraham Lincoln set a race of people free from the indignity of slavery. With the Union victory over the Confederate states, the government promised reform via Reconstruction. With the contentious election of Rutherford B. Hayes though, the political will to carry those reforms forward in earnest fell subordinate to the need for compromise and continuity. Within a generation, the cause of the black citizen passed from pipe dream to political controversy to conflagration to compromise to catharsis. The white man would not help, and would not keep his promises, and could not be counted on for meaningful change. All truth existed on a continuum, and this truth was more true in the south than in the north, more true in the cotton belt than in many other southern areas, and perhaps nowhere at all more true th

Packaging the Pentathlete: Leadership, Language, and the Liberal Arts

“I’m afraid I’ve got some bad news for me, and some good news for you…” said the raspy voice at the rostrum. “Somebody slipped me some bad whiskey last night, so I’m not gonna be able to make my speech.” (AUSA, 2004) That was Four-Star General and Army Chief of Staff Peter. J Schoomaker, addressing the Association of the United States Army in October of 2004. In an essay entitled “Regional Knowledge Systems,” (Siska/Hummel) Dr. Peter Siska refers to a term he attributes to Schoomaker. Siska uses the term “Pentathlete,” and credits the reference in the notes to Major Kareem P. Montague, who submitted an essay to the General Douglas MacArthur Military Leadership Writing Competition (and, incidentally, received second place). In this essay, Montague attributes the term to Schoomaker as well, asserting that Schoomaker first used the term in an interview with James Kitfield on 29 October, 2018. (Montague) This is true, and it is not true. Just three days prior to that interview with t

Modernization and the Ottoman Empire

The Ottoman Empire is famous for its size, scope, and influence upon the histories of nearly every major European country. Why then, did the concurrent attempts at modernization seem to fail for Turks, where the Egyptians succeeded? In short, the Turks, who wielded so much power and authority, failed to solidify their gains. One argument, and a strong one, is that they bit off more than they can chew. Another argument, equally compelling, is that they were simply beaten into bankruptcy. And yet another argument contends that reforms failed for Ottomans because of an insurmountable surge of internal resistance, from basically every direction.